Advances in dentistry have led to impressive technological developments in the last decade or so. Dental Implants near me have become the treatment of choice for replacing lost or missing teeth, and success rates have reached 95 per cent when conducted under proper surgical technique.

When a orthopedic surgeon known as P.I. introduced the concept of osseointegration or fusing titanium with bone into the dental world in the early 60s. Branemark adapted the application of this principle to dental use; however, it was considered risky and uncertain to introduce the technique into a dental environment.

Truth About Dental Implants

Success rates only exceeded 55-60 percent at this point in time, and many physicians thought that their incorporation into a patient’s treatment plan might be too early for a specific prosthesis ‘ predictable success. Improvements in the design of the dental implant surface were made mostly without vibration, clinical evidence to back up the claims of the manufacturer for improved success rates to improve success rates. A titanium dental implant was created through years of scientific experiments which looked much like that of a natural tooth root.

Some 40 years later, technology has facilitated their colloquial use among general dentists and specialists within the field of dental implants. When the implant dentistry market exploded no more than a decade ago, several implant manufacturers wanted to change the topographical surface of the implant fixture with unsubstantiated claims of improved performance
In fact, in particular one implant manufacturer holds educational seminars for doctors wishing to place dental implants over a single weekend. That’s right, in just 2 days, doctors will receive a certificate of surgical training which states that they have formal training in surgical implant dentistry and can thus place dental implants in a human subject.

In order to keep up with new implant manufacturers with better overall success rates, some companies will clone some portion of the implant from the rival and say that the results are identical with the newly added part. Conceptually this makes sense but in most situations a combination of design features is responsible for the increased success rates of some implant manufacturers.